Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Apr 8.
Published in final edited form as: JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Jun;3(6):602–611. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.03.019

Table 5.

Cumulative Odds Ratios for Comparative Studies (DES versus BMS)

Time Contributing studies DES
(n)
BMS
(n)
OR
(95% CI)
P value
Mortality 6–12months Erglis 2007(12) 53 50 0.94
(0.06–15.48)
p=0.97
2 years Han 2009 (78)
Palmerini 2007 (40)
Schrale 2008 (82)
1344 496 0.42
(0.28–0.62)
p<0.01
3 years Kim 2009 (80)
Tamburino 2009 (83)
Tamburino 2009 (84)
1809 736 0.70
(0.53–0.92)
p=0.01
MI 6–12 months Erglis 2007(12) 53 50 0.64
(0.19–2.17)
p= 0.47
2 years Han 2009 (78) 178 109 0.16
(0.01–3.53)
p=0.13
3 years Tamburino 2009 (83) 611 238 0.49
(0.26–0.92)
p=0.03
TVR/TLR 6–12 months Erglis 2007(12) 53 50 0.10
(0.01–0.84)
p=0.01
2 years No studies -- -- -- --
3 years Kim 2009 (80)
Tamburino 2009 (83)
Tamburino 2009 (84)
1809 736 0.46
(0.30–0.69)
p<0.01
MACE 6–12 months Chieffo 2005 (76)
Erglis 2007(12)
138 114 0.34
(0.15–0.78)
P=0.01
2 years Gao 2008 (77)
Han 2009 (78)
398 333 0.31
(0.15–0.66)
P<0.01
3 years Kim 2009 (80)
Tamburino 2009 (84)
1198 498 0.78
(0.57–1.07)
P=0.12
*

n refers to the number of patients within the studies who contributed to the estimate of interest. OR are reported with 95% confidence intervals.