Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Prostate. 2010 May 1;70(6):646–653. doi: 10.1002/pros.21098

Table 3.

Risk of any and increasingly advanced prostate cancer associated with CASP8 D302H in the PLCO Cancer Screening Trial

PLCO Population MAF Controls MAF Cases Per Allele OR* (95% CI) [H vs D] Heterozygous OR* (95% CI) [DH vs DD] Homozygous OR* (95% CI) [HH vs DD] Dominant OR* (95% CI) [DH, HH vs DD] Ptrend
Entire Cohort 0.133 0.126 0.94 (0.79–1.11) 0.91 (0.75–1.11) 1.03 (0.55–1.95) 0.92 (0.76–1.11) 0.46
Gleason ≤ 6 And Stage cT1–2 0.133 0.131 0.98 (0.79–1.23) 0.95 (0.74–1.23) 1.17 (0.52–2.60) 0.98 (0.75–1.24) 0.88
Gleason 7–10 OR Stage cT3–4 0.133 0.123 0.91 (0.74–1.11) 0.89 (0.71–1.11) 0.95 (0.45–2.01) 0.89 (0.71–1.11) 0.34
Gleason 8–10 OR Stage cT3–4 0.133 0.116 0.85 (0.65–1.12) 0.88 (0.65–1.19) 0.57 (0.11–1.95) 0.86 (0.64–1.15) 0.25
Gleason 7–10 AND Stage cT3–4 0.133 0.101 0.73 (0.50–1.07) 0.76 (0.50–1.15) 0.35 (0.008–2.25) 0.73 (0.49–1.10) 0.11
Gleason 8–10 AND Stage cT3–4 0.133 0.075 0.52 (0.24–1.14) 0.56 (0.25–1.27) - 0.52 (0.23–1.18) 0.10
*

Odds ratios are adjusted for age

Exact confidence interval calculated