Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Apr 8.
Published in final edited form as: J Biomech Eng. 2009 Dec;131(12):121004. doi: 10.1115/1.4000087

Table 1.

Summary of previous studies on the accuracy of MRI-derived 3D cartilage models

Validation method Specimens No. of specimens Error quantification
Cartilage volume Femoral, tibial, and patellar cartilage from amputated knees, and patellar cartilage from TKR surgery [3]
Tibial cartilage from TKR surgery [8]
Tibial and patellar cartilage from TKR surgery [10]
Femoral, tibial, and patellar cartilage from cadaveric human knees [12]
3+3
8
Half of 21
8
8.2% and 5.9% for two MRI methods
rms average 5.5%
qMRI overestimation in patella (5.1%) and lateral tibia (3.6%), and underestimation in medial tibia (−3.1%)
3.6%, 3.8%, 4.2%, and 1.1% for patellar, femoral, medial, and lateral cartilage, respectively
Cartilage surface area Tibial and patellar cartilage from TKR surgery [10] 21 4.6% to 9.1%
Cartilage thickness Tibial cartilage from TKR surgery [8]
Tibial and patellar cartilage from TKR surgery [10]
Femoral, tibial, and patellar cartilage from cadaveric human knees [12]
8
Half of 21
8
rms average 6.2%
4.3% for patella and 12.3% for medial tibia
For patella, 84.5% of the surface <1 mm error