Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Apr 8.
Published in final edited form as: Menopause. 2010 Sep–Oct;17(5):1026–1034. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e3181db61a1

TABLE 5.

Association of candidate genotypes with features of menopause: ORs with 95% CIsa associated with genotype main effect as well as interaction with menopause status [with interaction P value]

Gene Variant vs reference genotype comparison African American
European American
Depressive symptoms Hot flashes Depressive symptoms Hot flashes
COMT Met/Met vs Any Val 0.61 (0.31–1.17) [0.88] 1.29 (0.67–2.48) [0.76] 1.10 (0.67–1.79) [0.98] 0.82 (0.49–1.35) [0.09]
CYP19 264 Arg/Arg vs Any 264Cys 0.91 (0.58–1.44) [0.07] 0.68 (0.43–1.07) [0.62] 0.58 (0.27–1.25) [0.41] 0.86 (0.41–1.80) [0.75]
CYP1A2 Any *1F vs *1/*1 0.82 (0.46–1.46) [0.62] 1.04 (0.64–1.69) [0.006] 0.97 (0.55–1.73) [0.11] 0.96 (0.48–1.92) [0.54]
CYP1B1*3 Any *3 vs *1/*1 0.74 (0.48–1.15) [0.02] 0.62 (0.40–0.95) [0.93] 0.61 (0.35–1.06) [0.47] 0.94 (0.55–1.59) [0.39]
CYP1B1*4 Any *4 vs *1/*1 0.61 (0.30–1.21) [0.03] 0.66 (0.33–1.30) [0.54] 0.80 (0.51–1.26) [0.37] 1.20 (0.76–1.89) [0.44]
CYP3A4 Any *1B vs *1/*1 0.98 (0.58–1.66) [0.13] 1.10 (0.63–1.94) [0.50] 1.03 (0.48–2.19) [0.69] 0.87 (0.39–1.94) [0.12]
SULT1A1*2 Any *2 vs *1/*1 1.28 (0.82–2.0) [0.95] 0.77 (0.48–1.24) [0.31] 0.77 (0.50–1.17) [0.007] 0.75 (0.49–1.14) [0.34]
SULT1A1*3 Any *3 vs *1/*1 1.27 (0.81–1.97) [0.58] 0.95 (0.59–1.50) [0.88] 0.53 (0.41–0.68) – 2.08 (1.64–2.63) [<0.001]
SULT1E1 5′UTR Any A vs G/G 0.68 (0.41–1.11) [0.89] 1.39 (0.86–2.23) [0.80] 0.97 (0.53–1.78) [0.12] 1.43 (0.77–2.63) [0.92]
SULT1E1 3′UTR Any C vs T/T 1.33 (0.67–2.66) [0.08] 1.01 (0.49–2.10) [0.07] 0.91 (0.59–1.38) [0.87] 0.86 (0.57–1.31) [0.24]

OR, odds ratio.

a

ORs were estimated from repeated-measures logistic regression analysis adjusted for the following variables: menopause status (late premenopause, early transition, late transition, postmenopausal).