Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Apr 8.
Published in final edited form as: Genet Test. 2008 Mar;12(1):81–91. doi: 10.1089/gte.2007.0037

Table 4.

Genetic Testing Uptake after Disclosure of Known BRCA1/2 Mutations

Number tested/told (%)a,b p-valuec OR CI
First-degree relative
Mother vs. father 7/9 (78) vs. 9/12 (75) 1.0 1.17 0.10–17.53
Sister vs. brother 122/155 (79) vs. 71/134 (53) <0.01 3.28 1.91–5.67
Daughter vs. son 36/63 (57) vs. 15/47 (53) 0.01 2.84 1.21–6.80
Female vs. male 165/227 (73) vs. 95/193 (49) <0.01 2.75 1.79–4.21
Second-degree relative
Maternal aunt vs. maternal uncle 17/27 (63) vs. 20/31 (65) 1.0 0.94 0.28–3.14
Paternal aunt vs. paternal uncle 0/6 (0) vs. 0/3 (0)
Maternal lineage vs. paternal lineage 37/58 (63) vs. 0/9 (0) <0.01
Niece vs. nephew 30/36 (83) vs. 7/29 (24) <0.01 15.71 4.05–64.36
Female vs. male 47/69 (68) vs. 27/63 (43) <0.01 2.85 1.32–6.18
FDR vs. SDR 260/420 (61) vs. 74/132 (56) 0.26 1.27 0.84–1.93
Older vs. younger generationd 246/377 (65) vs. 88/175 (50) <0.01 1.86 1.27–2.72
Female FDR and SDR vs. male FDR and SDR 212/296 (72) vs. 122/256 (48) <0.01 2.77 1.92–4.01
a

Denominator represents nonmissing data only and represents the number of people who were informed of genetic risk and who had genetic testing, based on knowledge of survey participant. Several participants answered unknown, so the denominator docs not match the number given for number told in Table 2 or 3.

b

Percent of people who received testing for BRCA1/2 status after a family member was diagnosed with the mutation (number tested/total number).

c

Two-sided Fisher’s exact test (FET).

d

Older generation (mother/father/aunt/uncle/sister/brother); younger generation (daughter/son/niece/nephew).