Skip to main content
. 2010 Jul 6;22(5):1431–1439. doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1338-7

Table 3.

Results of univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis for low BMD

Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
OR (95% CI) p value OR (95% CI) p value
Age (years)a 1.017 (0.981–1.055) 0.353 1.066 (1.008–1.129) 0.026
Genderb 4.368 (1.791–10.652) 0.001 e
Disease duration (years)a 1.012 (0.974–1.052) 0.539 e
BASDAI (range 0–10)c 0.728 (0.554–0.957) 0.023 0.648 (0.455–0.923) 0.016
ESR (mm/h)c 1.012 (0.980–1.034) 0.287 1.025 (0.994–1.057) 0.112
CRP (mg/L)c 1.018 (0.994–1.042) 0.143 e
ASDASc 0.769 (0.461–1.283) 0.315 f
BASFI (range 0–10)c 0.959 (0.790–1.165) 0.674 f
PINP Z-scorec 1.602 (1.043–2.461) 0.031 e
sCTX Z-scorec 1.878 (1.262–2.794) 0.002 2.563 (1.370–4.794) 0.003
OC Z-scorec 1.766 (1.135–2.749) 0.012 e
25OHvitD (nmol/L)c 0.998 (0.983–1.013) 0.787 e
VFd 0.902 (0.385–2.109) 0.811 f

See Table 1 for definitions

OR refers to the risk of low BMD (lumbar spine or hip BMD T-score ≤ −1)

aPer year

bIf gender is male (versus female)

cPer 1 grade or 1 point

dIf vertebral fracture is present (versus absent)

eThe variable was not selected during multivariate regression analysis

fThe variable was not tested in multivariate regression analysis because of a p value > 0.3 in univariate regression analysis, no significant correlation with lumbar spine or hip BMD T-scores, and no significant difference between men and women