Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Apr 10.
Published in final edited form as: Optom Vis Sci. 2005 Dec;82(12):1038–1046. doi: 10.1097/01.opx.0000192350.01045.6f

TABLE 2.

Comparison of standard classifier performance metrics (n = 244)

Classifier Cut point
(≥)
Sensitivity
(%)
Specificity
(%)
Accuracy
(%)
C4.5* 1 92 93 93
CLMI 3.00 79 99 90
Z3 0.00233 86 92 89
RM (D) 47.2 (1.4) 91 81 86
KISA% 100 71 95 83
KPI 0.23 92 59 74

Selected cut points are published values recommended by the author of each classification method.

*

C4.5 classifier performance is estimated by 10-fold cross validation.

Reported RM cut points are K-value and (I-S values), respectively.

C4.5, decision tree classifier21; CLMI, Cone Location and Magnitude Index; RM, Modified Rabinowitz–McDonnell Index10; KISA%, K-value, IS-value, and Astigmatism Index10; Z3, third-order Zernike