Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Apr 11.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2010 Feb;25(2):183–190. doi: 10.1002/gps.2318

Table 3.

Relationship between treatment response and functional outcomes

Functional outcome scale* Responders
Non-responders
** F ** df p-value
Baseline Endpoint Baseline Endpoint
* Physical SF-12 45.7 (±9.9) 44.3 (±10.0) 41.6 (±10.5) 42.2 (±10.9) 6.21 1,150 0.791
* Mental SF-12 42.3 (±11.1) 50.4 (±8.7) 39.1 (±10.7) 41.3 (±9.7) 33.22 1,149 0.000
* SSPA 32.6 (±6.6) 32.6 (±6.4) 31.7 (±6.7) 31.7 (±6.8) 0.23 1,134 0.632
* MMAA total errors 9.4 (±7.8) 8.4 (±7.7) 8.1 (±5.5) 7.5 (±5.8) 0.15 1,131 0.697
* QOLS 58.0 (±22.8) 64.5 (±23.2) 57.7 (±20.9) 57.8 (±24.2) 5.18 1,134 0.024

Values represent means with standard deviation in parentheses.

*

Physical SF-12 = physical component of the medical outcomes study short form SF-12; Mental SF-12 = mental component of the SF-12; SSPA = social skills performance assessments; MMAA total errors = total number of medication errors on the medication management ability assessments; QOLS = Quality of Life Scale.

**

F values with degrees of freedom (df) derived from analysis of covariance. Outcome at the study end point was the dependent variable. Treatment group, site, baseline severity, and treatment group by site interaction were included as independent variables.