Table 3.
Comparison of the Ability of AIMs to Distinguish Different Continental Populationsa
number of AIMs (4 Pop In)b | number of AIMs (4 Pop In) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
128 | 96 | 64 | 48 | 24 | 128 | 96 | 64 | 48 | 24 | |
Subject Group | >10% non-EURA Ancestryc | >15% non-EURA Ancestry | ||||||||
EURA (188) | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.05 |
AFR (98) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
AMI (105) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
EAS (188) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
SAS (64) | 0.98 | 0.95 | 0.94 | 0.83 | 0.64 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 0.47 |
AFA (88) | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 |
PRA (28) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.89 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 0.86 | 0.79 |
MAM/MXN (66) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.97 |
>10% non-AFR Ancestry | >15 % non-AFR Ancestry | |||||||||
EURA | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
AFR | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.03 |
AMI | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
EAS | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
SAS | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
AFA | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.84 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.73 |
PRA | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
MAM/MXN | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
>10% non-AMI Ancestry | >15% non-AMI Ancestry | |||||||||
EURA | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
AFR | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
AMI | 0.17 | 0.23 | 0.22 | 0.26 | 0.31 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.19 |
EAS | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
SAS | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
AFA | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
PRA | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
MAM/MXN | 0.95 | 0.97 | 0.95 | 0.97 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.92 | 0.91 | 0.83 |
>10% non-EAS Ancestry | >15% non-EAS Ancestry | |||||||||
EURA | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
AFR | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
AMI | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 |
EAS | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.17 | 0.26 | 0.61 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.13 | 0.42 |
SAS | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
AFA | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
PRA | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
MAM/MXN | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.98 |
The ability to exclude subjects based on different numbers of AIMs is shown using both 10% and 15% non-Ancestry group membership.
The top of each column indicates the number of AIMs in each set. The AIMs were selected based on informativeness in four population groups (see Methods). Analyses were performed using K = 4.
For each set the criteria for exclusion is shown. The fraction of subjects that would be excluded for each criterion is indicated for each subject group.