Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Apr 11.
Published in final edited form as: Hum Mutat. 2009 Jan;30(1):69–78. doi: 10.1002/humu.20822

Table 4.

Summary of Confidence Intervals Using Different Marker Sets

90% Confidence Intervalsa
AIMs AFA MAM/MXN AFA, PRA, MAM/MXN
128 In4 0.167 0.187 0.163
96 In4 0.174 0.219 0.180
64 In4 0.196 0.267 0.219
48 In4 0.220 0.302 0.247
24 In4 0.274 0.418 0.305
64 In2b 0.171 0.209 N.A.
48 In2 0.188 0.232 N.A.
24 In2 0.240 0.304 N.A.
a

The average of the individual subject 90% Bayesian confidence intervals (CI) was determined using the different AIM sets. For the AFA and MAM/MXA subject groups the CI were determined using K=2. For the combined admixed group (AFA, PRA, MAM/MXA) the CI was determined using K=3.

b

For the 2PopIn marker sets, the CI was determined using the EURA/AFR for AFA or EURA/AMI for the MAM/MXN subject groups.