Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb 15;8(2):A35.

Table 3.

Physician Ratings of Patient, Provider, and System Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening, New Mexico Primary Care Physician Survey of Colorectal Cancer Screening Barriers (N = 216), 2006a

Perceived Barrier Mean (SD)b
Patient
Embarrassment or anxiety 4.7 (1.0)
Fear of pain 4.5 (1.1)
Inadequate insurance 4.0 (1.6)
Lack of knowledge about screening tests 3.8 (1.2)
Lack of knowledge about CRC risk 3.8 (1.2)
Lack of perceived CRC susceptibility 3.8 (1.2)
Lack of benefit for CRC screening 3.7 (1.2)
Logistical barriers 3.7 (1.2)
Low utilization of annual health maintenance visits 3.7 (1.2)
Fear of finding cancer 3.6 (1.2)
Competing demands 3.6 (1.2)
Lack of benefit for CRC treatment 3.4 (1.3)
Low literacy 3.2 (1.3)
Fatalism 3.2 (1.2)
Poor patient adherence 3.2 (1.3)
Cultural factors 3.2 (1.2)
Inability to perform preparation for procedures 3.1 (1.1)
Family or friends had bad CRC experience 2.9 (1.1)
Language (non- or weak English speaker) 2.7 (1.2)
Non-US citizenship status 2.5 (1.7)
Colonoscopy complications 2.3 (1.1)
Barium enema complications 1.7 (1.1)
Flexible sigmoidoscopy complications 1.6 (1.0)
Provider
Limited accuracy of FOBT 3.1 (1.4)
Lack of time to discuss screening 2.5 (1.1)
Lack of sigmoidoscopy skills 2.1 (1.8)
Lack of time to arrange screening 2.0 (1.1)
Difficulty counseling about screening 1.8 (1.0)
Complexity of screening options 1.7 (1.0)
Questions about efficacy of screening 1.7 (1.0)
System barriers: implementing screening
Lack of screening system reminder 2.8 (1.4)
Lack of support staff for follow-up 2.6 (1.5)
Lack of FOBT result tracking system 2.4 (1.3)
Lack of patient educational material 2.3 (1.3)
Inadequate reimbursement for screening 2.0 (1.4)
System barriers: obtaining lower endoscopy
Long waits to get lower endoscopy 3.0 (1.5)
Lack of resources for screening procedures 2.6 (1.7)
Difficulty scheduling lower endoscopy 2.6 (1.4)
Lack of resources for diagnostic procedures 2.3 (1.5)
Poor feedback on procedural results 2.2 (1.2)

Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; CRC, colorectal cancer; FOBT, fecal occult blood test.

a

Barriers were rated by providers for perceived frequency using a 6-point scale from 1 = "never"/"not" to 6 = "most"/"very".

b

A multivariate analysis of variance showed that means differing by ≥0.2 were significantly different at P < .05 by Fisher's least significant difference method for all barriers except for system barriers, for which means differing by ≥0.3 were significant.