Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Addict Behav. 2010 Dec 28;36(5):516–519. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.12.027

Table A.1.

Logistic Regression Analysis: Past-Year Energy Drink Users vs. Past-Year Non- Energy Drink Users (n=770)

Energy Drink Users (vs. Non-Energy Drink Usersa)
OR (95% CI)
Gender
 Male 3.74 (2.15, 6.51)***
 Female Refb
Race/Ethnicity
 Black 1.11 (0.53, 2.33)
 Otherc 2.26 (1.02, 5.00)*
 White Ref
Age
 18–29 8.83 (3.46, 22.55)***
 30–54 3.55 (1.70, 7.40)**
 55+ Ref
Education
 Less than High School 0.46 (0.12, 1.81)
 High School 1.54 (0.74, 3.20)
 Some College 1.45 (0.81, 2.61)
 College Degree Ref
Employment
 Not Employed 0.87 (0.47, 1.61)
 Employed (full or part time) Ref
Household Income
 ≤$29,999 0.44 (0.16, 1.20)
 $30,000–$59,999 0.67 (0.34, 1.32)
 $60,000+ Ref
Marital Status
 Not Married 1.86 (0.96, 3.59)
 Married Ref
Children in Household
 No 0.79 (0.44, 1.42)
 Yes Ref
Place of Residence
 Milwaukee City 1.99 (1.14, 3.47)*
 Surrounding Aread Ref
a

Includes lifetime energy drink users who did not consume energy drinks in the past year.

b

Reference category.

c

American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian or Pacific Islander, Hispanic, and Other Racial/Ethnic Background.

d

Includes suburban areas of Milwaukee County plus the counties of Ozaukee, Washington, and Waukesha.

*

p<.05.

**

p=.001.

***

p<.0001.