Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am Heart J. 2011 Jan 31;161(3):516–522. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.11.007

Table IV.

Relative risks and 95% confidence intervals for CHD from the Nurses’ Health Study (1990 – 2004) according to baseline Lp-PLA2 activity levels stratified by early vs. late events

Quartiles of Lp-PLA2 P-trend
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
EARLY (≤ 6 years of follow-up)
Women
 Cases 30 50 69 94
 Matching factors adjusted model* RR 1.0 1.93 2.33 3.50 <0.001
  95% CI 1.13, 3.31 1.42, 3.83 2.12, 5.77
 Multivariable + lipid adjusted model RR 1.0 1.67 1.90 1.94 0.04
  95% CI 0.91, 3.07 1.07, 3.40 1.04, 3.74

LATE (> 6 years of follow-up)
Women
 Cases 30 33 47 68
 Matching factors adjusted model* RR 1.0 1.0 1.51 2.20 <0.001
  95% CI 0.55, 1.83 0.86, 2.64 1.27, 3.80
 Multivariable + lipid adjusted model RR 1.0 1.02 1.35 1.58 0.13
  95% CI 0.53, 1.97 0.68, 2.68 0.74, 3.37

Abbreviations: CHD, Coronary Heart Disease; Q, Quartile; RR, relative risk; CI, Confidence Interval

*

RR estimated by conditional logistic regression after conditioning on matching factors (smoking, age, fasting status, month of blood draw)

Multivariable model adjusted for BMI, history of high cholesterol, history of diabetes, history of hypertension, alcohol use, aspirin use, cholesterol-lowering medication use, physical activity, CRP, postmenopausal hormone use, HDL, LDL, history of high cholesterol, and cholesterol-lowering medication use