Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Apr 11.
Published in final edited form as: HIV Med. 2007 Oct;8(7):439–450. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2007.00491.x

Table 2.

Sensitivity analysis of potentially important model variables on the long-term effectiveness of genotype testing vs clinical judgement alone*

Increase in Life Expectancy (months)
Resistance to LPV/r after the initial regimen failure in genotype testing arm (vs 49.3% in the clinical judgement only arm)
 49.3% 10.3
 41.9% (base case) 10.5
Efficacy of darunavir/r-containing regimen without enfuvirtide in patients with resistant strains to LPV/r in the clinical judgement alone arm
 13% suppression, week 24 (base case) 10.5
 16% suppression, week 24 10.3
 20% suppression, week 24 9.9
Efficacy of darunavir/r- and enfuvirtide-containing regimen used in patients in genotype testing arm
 63% suppression at week 48 (base case) 10.5
 78% suppression at week 48 14.2
 95% suppression at week 48 18.3
Proportion of patients with resistant strains to LPV/r in the clinical judgement alone arm who received a darunavir/r – and enfuvirtide-containing regimen after the first virological failure
 0% (base case) 10.5
 30% 6.3
 50% 3.5
A new class of HIV antiviral drugs available††
 No (base case) 10.5
 Yes, MK-0518 8.1
*

Life expectancies reported in this table are discounted.

Based on information from genotype resistance tests performed during earlier failures.

††

For this analysis, we hypothesized that MK-0518 would be available after the second antiretroviral regimen failure. In the clinical judgement alone arm and in patients in the genotype resistance testing arm who where sensitive to lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) after the initial antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimen failure, the third ART regimen was assumed to be a darunavir/ritonavir MK-0518-containing regimen. In patients in the genotype resistance testing arm who were resistant to lopinavir/ritonavir after the initial ART regimen failure, the third ART regimen was assumed to be a MK-0518-containing regimen without darunavir. Efficacy data on a MK-0518-containing regimen were from the interim study results of a phase 2b, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging, placebo-controlled study that compared MK-0518 plus optimized background therapy (OBT) to placebo plus OBT in experienced patients [39]. The cost of MK-0518 was considered to be the same as that of darunavir.