Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Feb 10.
Published in final edited form as: J Control Release. 2010 Nov 1;149(3):323–331. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.10.031

Table 2.

Biodistribution of anti-ICAM/α-Gal nanocarriers vs α-Gal in mice

Brain
Heart
Kidney
Liver
Lung
Spleen
α-Gal NCs α-Gal α-Gal NCs α-Gal α-Gal NCs α-Gal α-Gal NCs α-Gal α-Gal NCs α-Gal α-Gal NCs α-Gal
%ID 0.13±0.01 0.25±0.01 0.33±0.04a 0.49±0.06 1.89±0.14b 10.12±0.77 18.41±1.22b 6.68±0.56 36.24±3.47b 0.74±0.07 3.11±0.43b 0.40±0.03
%ID/g 0.28±0.02b 0.56±0.03 2.12±0.32a 3.23±0.30 4.58±0.32b 24.58±1.49 12.36±0.71b 4.48±0.40 175.34±21.41b 3.80±0.33 25.69±2.78b 3.66±0.27
LR 0.11±0.02b 0.03±0.002 0.82±0.17b 0.16±0.01 1.71±0.12 1.21±0.06 4.76±0.51b 0.22±0.01 70.07±12.02b 0.19±0.02 9.32±1.48b 0.18±0.01
SI 3.67 5.13 1.41 21.64 368.79 51.78

%ID = percentage of injected dose, %ID/g = % ID per gram of tissue, LR = localization ratio, ratio of %ID/g of tissue to %ID/g of blood, SI = specificity index, calculated as the ratio of LR in an organ for the NC formulation vs the non-targeted enzyme. Organs were collected 30 min after injection. Data are mean±SEM, n≥8 mice.

a

is p<0.05,

b

is p<0.001, by Student’s t-test.