Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Biol Inorg Chem. 2010 Oct 31;16(2):285–297. doi: 10.1007/s00775-010-0725-z

Table 2.

Fits obtained to the Cu and Se EXAFS of reconstituted Cu(I) and Cu(II) proteins of H135 mutants by curve-fitting using the program EXCURV 9.2

Sample/fit Fa Cu–S
Cu–Se
E0
Nob R (Å)c DW (Å2) Nob R (Å)c DW (Å2)
Copper EXAFS
 Cu(I)Met 0.282 2.7 2.22 0.013 1.92
 Cu(I)SeM 0.472 2 2.24 0.009 0.6 2.38 0.010 4.20
 Cu(II)Metd 0.321 3 2.22 0.012 1.89
 Cu(II)SeMd 0.391 2 2.21 0.009 1.0 2.36 0.011 2.00

Sample/fit Fa Se–C
Se–Cud
E0
Nob R (Å)c DW (Å2) Nob R (Å)c DW (Å2)
Selenium EXAFS
 Cu(I)SeM 0.718 2 1.96 0.005 1.2 2.39 0.009 5.96
 Cu(II)SeM 1.031 2 1.95 0.005 1.0 2.36 0.011 5.04
a

F is a least-squares fitting parameter defined as F2=1Ni=1Nk6(DataModel)2

b

Coordination numbers are generally considered accurate to ±25%

c

In any one fit, the statistical error in bond lengths is ±0.005 Å. However, when errors due to imperfect background subtraction, phase-shift calculations, and noise in the data are compounded, the actual error is probably closer to ±0.02 Å

d

Shell occupancy values have been renormalized by multiplying by 4 (the total number of methionines, both coordinating and noncoordinating, in the protein) so as to represent the number of Cu scatterers interacting with the coordinated Se atom