Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Trends Neurosci. 2011 Apr;34(4):177–187. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2011.02.001

Table 1.

Effect of development and experience on spine dynamics in different regions of rodent cortex in vivo.

Species/cells labeled Age Main findings Refs.
Visual cortex
Mouse (H-line), L5 neurons 1–10m Spines in the adult visual cortex were found to be very stable, with a half-life of >13 months. Over 95% of spines persisted over 1 month. [39]
Mouse (H/M-line), L2/3/5 neurons P28-61 Spine motility varied in different cortices at 1 month of age, with the visual cortex being the most stable. Rewiring visual inputs into the auditory cortex did not change intrinsic spine motility in the auditory cortex. [40]
Mouse (M-line), L5 neurons >3m Focal retinal lesions dramatically increased spine turnover in the lesion projection zone, leading to an almost complete replacement of original spines within 2 months. [46]
Mouse (M-line), L2/3/5 neurons >1.5m MD increased spine formation in L5, but not L2/3 neurons, in the binocular cortex. Spines formed during MD persisted during binocular vision restoration, and were strengthened during the second MD. [30]
Mouse (M-line), L5 neurons ~P28 Dark-rearing resulted in high motility and immature morphology of spines. While brief light exposure increased spine motility, prolonged light exposure stabilized spines over time. [32]
Barrel cortex
Rat, virus-labeled L2/3 neurons P8-16 Spines and filopodia were highly motile during early postnatal development. Trimming all the whiskers unilaterally reduced spine and filopodium motility in the contralateral barrel cortex during a critical period between P11 and P13. [17]
Mouse (M-line), L5 neurons P34-74 Spines displayed a spectrum of stability. Chessboard deprivation increased the pool of transient spines and decreased the pool of stable spines. [19]
Mouse (M/H-line), L2/3/5 neurons P14-511 The fraction of persistent spines increased with an animal’s age. The visual cortex was observed to be more stable than the barrel cortex in 6m old mice. [28]
Mouse (H-line), L5 neurons P14-23m Spines and filopodia displayed distinct dynamics. Spine dynamics decreased with age. In adults, a majority of spines were stable throughout the animal’s life. [36]
Mouse (H-line), L5 neurons 1–6m Trimming all the whiskers unilaterally prevented spine elimination in the contralateral barrel cortex in both adolescent and adult mice. This activity-dependent spine elimination was NMDA receptor dependent. [27]
Mouse (M-line), L5 neurons 2–5m Chessboard whisker trimming stabilized new spines and destabilized previously persistent spines, preferentially on L5 neurons with complex apical tufts. [29]
Mouse (H-line), L5 neurons 1–18.5m Sensory enrichment increased spine formation and elimination. Most spines formed early during development and a small fraction of new spines induced by novel experience survived experience-dependent elimination and were preserved into adulthood. [38]
Mouse (M-line), L5 neurons 2–3m Chessboard whisker trimming increased new spine stabilization at the border between spared and deprived barrel columns. CaMKII autophosphorylation-defective mutant mice lacked such experience-dependent spine stabilization. [31]
Motor cortex
Mouse (H-line) L5 neurons 1m, >4m Forelimb-specific motor skill training induced rapid spine formation, followed by prolonged spine reorganization selectively in the forelimb region. Different motor skills affected different populations of spines. [37]
Mouse (H-line) L5 neurons 1m, >4m Rotarod training increased spine turnover. [38]

Abbreviations: months (m), Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CAMKII).