Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am Heart J. 2011 Mar;161(3):611–621. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.11.020

Table 3. REMODELING CHANGES BY BASELINE VIABILITY.

Paired Data (Winsorized for LV ED*, LV ES and WM)

SEVERELY
REDUCED
VIABILITY < 40%
MODERATE
RETAINED
VIABILITY≥ 40%


(N = 33 (N = 79) p-value
n Mean±SD n Mean±SD
LV ED Volume (ml)
Baseline 29 156.5±44.6 76 114.0±37.0 <0.001
1 yr 29 148.1±47.8 76 113.4±37.7 <0.001
Change (1yr-Baseline) 29 −8.3±21.9 76 0.57±28.0 0.18
p-value (within group) 0.05 0.86
LV ES Volume (ml)
Baseline 29 95.5±40.0 76 60.2±29.7 <0.001
1 yr 29 88.6±41.0 76 55.7±28.9 <0.001
Change (1yr-Baseline) 29 −6.9±20.3 76 −4.5±20.6 0.60
p-value (within group) 0.08 0.06
Ejection Fraction (%)
Baseline 29 41.3±11.5 76 49.2±10.2 0.001
1 yr 29 42.7±13.3 76 53.6±10.6 <0.001
Change (1yr-Baseline) 29 1.4±7.0 76 4.4±7.0 0.05
p-value (within group) 0.30 <0.001
Wall Motion Score
Baseline 30 24.0±6.9 76 15.3±7.3 <0.001
1 yr 30 18.8±9.2 76 10.1±8.1 <0.001
Change (1yr-Baseline) 30 5.2±6.7 76 −5.2±6.8 0.98
p-value (within group) <0.001 <0.001
*

LV ED=left ventricular end-diastolic dimension,

LV ES =ventricular end-systolic dimension,

WM=wall motion