Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am Heart J. 2011 Mar;161(3):611–621. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.11.020

Table 5. INTERACTION – REMODELING CHANGES BY BASELINE VIABILITY & TREATMENT GROUP.

Paired Data (Winsorized for LV ED*, LV ES and WM)

SEVERELY REDUCED
VIABILITY < 40%
MODERATE RETAINED
VIABILITY ≥ 40%


PCI§ MED PCI MED
(N = 13) (N = 20) (N = 42) (N = 37) Interaction
n Mean±SD n Mean±SD p-value n Mean±SD n Mean±SD p-value p-value
LV ED Volume (ml)
1 3
Baseline 12 153.2±52.2 7 158.8±39.9 0.75 41 108.9±36.4 5 120.0±37.4 0.19 0.75
1 3
1 yr 12 142.6±54.1 7 152.1±44.2 0.61 41 107.2±36.9 5 120.7±37.9 0.12 0.82
1 3
Change (1 yr-Baseline) 12 −10.7±26.1 7 −6.7±19.2 0.64 41 −1.7±30.3 5 0.74±25.3 0.71 0.90
p-value (within group) 0.18 0.17 0.72 0.86
LV ES Volume (ml)
1 3
Baseline 12 88.4±44.8 7 100.5±36.7 0.43 41 57.2±29.5 5 59.1±30.0 0.35 0.70
1 3
1 yr 12 82.7±48.0 7 92.8±36.2 0.52 41 52.7±27.8 5 59.1±30.0 0.34 0.80
1 3
Change (1 yr-Baseline) 12 −5.8±22.1 7 −7.7±19.5 0.80 41 4.5±22.7 5 4.5±18.2 0.99 0.84
p-value (within group) 0.39 0.12 0.21 0.15
Ejection Fraction (%)
1 3
Baseline 12 44.8±12.6 7 38.9±10.3 0.18 41 57.2±29.5 5 48.3±10.1 0.52 0.35
1 3
1 yr 12 45.9±16.8 7 40.4±10.2 0.28 41 52.7±27.8 5 53.6±10.0 0.96 0.27
1 3
Change (1 yr-Baseline) 12 1.2±8.6 7 1.5±5.9 0.89 41 4.5±22.7 5 5.3±7.6 0.32 0.68
p-value (within group) 0.65 0.30 0.21 <0.001
Wall Motion Score
1 3
Baseline 12 23.2±7.8 7 24.6±6.5 0.60 41 49.9±10.4 5 15.6±6.8 0.71 0.81
1 3
1 yr 12 17.7±10.4 7 19.6±8.6 0.59 41 53.5±11.3 5 10.5±7.2 0.71 0.75
1 3
Change (1 yr-Baseline) 12 −5.5±7.7 7 −5.0±6.1 0.84 41 3.7±6.5 5 −5.1±5.8 0.96 0.89
p-value (within group) 0.003 <0.001 <0.001
*

LV ED=left ventricular end-diastolic dimension,

LV ES =ventricular end-systolic dimension

WM=wall motion,

§

PCI=percutaneous coronary intervention,

MED=medical therapy alone,