Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Addict. 2011 May 1;20(3):250–256. doi: 10.1111/j.1521-0391.2011.00123.x

Table I.

Case selection process. Baseline assessments were available for 537 men reporting only sex with women

Assessment time point pair
Step in case selection criteria Baseline-3 Months Baseline-6 Months 3 Months–6 months
n (%) n (%) n (%)
Recent sexual event reported at both assessments* 354 (65.9) 346 (64.4) 312 (58.1%)
Respondent had same partner type (regular/casual) at both sexual events 297 274 257
Sufficient event detail to determine under the Influence & sexual risk 280 (94.3) 253 (92.3) 238 (92.6)
Respondent under the influence for both events 59 (21.1) 42 (16.2) 46 (19.3)
Respondent under the influence for neither event 147 (52.5) 137 (54.2) 146 (61.3)
Discordant under the influence events
 Under the influence for first event, but not second event 44 (15.7) 48 (19.0) 22 (9.2)
  Safe sex at both events 4 (1.4) 4 (1.6) 3 (1.3)
  Unsafe sex at both events 26 (9.3) 29 (11.5) 11 (4.6)
  Safe sex at first event, unsafe sex at second event 9 (3.2) 6 (2.4) 4 (1.7)
  Safe sex at second event, unsafe sex at first event 5 (1.8) 9 (3.6) 4 (1.7)
 Under the influence for second event, but not first event 30 (10.7) 27 (10.7) 24 (10.1)
  Safe sex at both events 6 (2.1) 1 (0.4) 2 (0.8)
  Unsafe sex at both events 18 (6.4) 22 (8.7 19 (8.0)
  Safe sex at first event, unsafe sex at second event 5 (1.8) 4 (1.6) 0 (0)
  Safe sex at second event, unsafe sex at first event 1 (0.4) 0 (0) 3 (1.3)
Cases selected (sum of bolded cells) 20 (7.1) 19 (7.5) 11 (4.6)
*

Denominator to determine the percent is based on total number of cases

Denominator to determine the percent is from row above

Denominator to determine the percent is based on the number with sufficient event detail to determine under the Influence & sexual risk