Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Contraception. 2010 Nov 23;83(5):479–485. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.10.001

Table 3.

Comparison of contraceptive use at the time of enrollment among analysis sample for the Contraceptive CHOICE Project (CHOICE, 2007–2008) with the National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG, 2006–2008) and Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System for Missouri (BRFSS-MO, 2006).

CHOICE and NSFG CHOICE and BRFSS-MO

CHOICEa NSFG Absolute difference Effect size CHOICEb BRFSS-MO Absolute difference Effect size

% SE % SE % p value Cohen’s hc % SE % SE % p value Cohen’s hc
Vasectomy 0.1 0.1 8.3 0.7 −8.2 <0.01 0.52 0.3 0.3 13.1 1.6 −12.8 <0.01 0.63
Implant 0.02 0.02 0.08 0.05 −0.06 N/A 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.9 0.8 −0.9 N/A 0.17
IUD 0.9 0.4 4.9 0.6 −4.0 <0.01 0.26 0.3 0.1 1.7 0.9 −1.4 <0.01 0.14
Injectables 2.6 0.5 2.9 0.3 −0.3 <0.01 0.02 3.6 0.8 2.5 0.9 1.1 <0.01 0.06
Pill 16.1 1.2 24.0 1.0 −7.9 <0.01 0.20 16.8 1.8 19.8 2.4 −3.0 <0.01 0.08
Patch 0.7 0.2 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.32* 0.01 0.4 0.1 1.2 0.8 −0.8 <0.01 0.09
Ring 4.7 0.6 2.1 0.3 2.6 <0.01 0.15 5.0 0.7 0.9 0.5 4.1 <0.01 0.26
Condom 23.8 1.8 13.8 0.7 10.0 <0.01 0.26 20.4 2.1 12.9 2.0 7.5 <0.01 0.20
Diaphragm 0.1 0.1 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.29 0.01 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.4 −0.4 0.09 0.09
Rhythm 1.0 0.6 0.9 0.2 0.1 0.07 0.01 1.6 1.2 2.0 0.7 −0.4 <0.01 0.03
Withdrawal 5.8 0.7 4.7 0.5 1.1 <0.01 0.05 6.6 1.4 0.4 0.3 6.2 <0.01 0.39
Other 0.04 0.03 0.3 0.1 −0.26 N/A 0.07 0.04 0.03 2.0 0.9 −2.0 N/A 0.25
Non-users 44.2 2.0 37.1 1.1 7.1 <0.01 0.14 44.8 2.9 41.9 2.9 2.9 <0.01 0.06
a

Estimates are adjusted to NSFG for age and race/ethnicity.

b

Estimates are adjusted to Missouri BRFSS for age and race/ethnicity.

c

Cohen’s h: value of 0.20 is considered small, 0.50 medium and 0.80 large effect size.