Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Virol. 2010 Oct 30;155(12):2083–2103. doi: 10.1007/s00705-010-0814-x

Table 6.

Use of ICTV-accepted virus names versus use of colloquial terms since the introduction of the most recent ICTV nomenclature in 2002 [32] (as of February 28, 2010)

Occurrence in
PubMed article titles
Occurrence in
PubMed articles
“Lake Victoria marburgvirus” (ICTV) 1 6
“Marburg virus” 57 202
“Zaire ebolavirus” (ICTV) 7 35
“Zaire Ebola virus” 3 14
“Ebola virus Zaire” 2 5
“Ebola Zaire [virus]” 3 23
“Ebola virus” a 244 416
“Reston ebolavirus” (ICTV) 1 8
“Reston Ebola virus” 3 5
“Ebola virus Reston” 2 2
“Ebola Reston [virus]” 5 7
“Sudan ebolavirus” (ICTV) 0 8
“Sudan Ebola virus” 2 2
“Ebola virus Sudan” 1 2
“Ebola Sudan [virus]” 1 4
“Cote d'Ivoire ebolavirus” [sic] (ICTV) 0 3
“Côte d'Ivoire ebolavirus” 0 3
“Cote d'Ivoire Ebola virus” [sic] 0 7
“Côte d'Ivoire Ebola virus” 0 7
“Ivory Coast ebolavirus” 0 3
“Ebola Ivory Coast [virus]” 0 11
“Ebola Côte d'Ivoire [virus]” 0 7

Note that this search does not differentiate between species and viruses. However, in the vast majority of articles that refer to species names, virus names are actually meant [as judged by the authors] Ebola virus was used predominantly, but not exclusively, for “Zaire ebolavirus”–hence the correct number is slightly smaller than the one stated in this table