Skip to main content
. 2010 Dec 1;105(3):1130–1140. doi: 10.1152/jn.00394.2010

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Relationship between the extent of adaptation and the difference between inherent hypometria and presented error size. Hypometria was measured as the difference between the requested saccade size (20°) and the average preadaptation primary saccade amplitude. The difference between hypometria and error size is related to adaptation: when hypometria exceeds the presented error, saccade gain decreases, and vice versa as expected (n = 12; 14 sessions). Data were included from subjects who experienced the 0.7° constant error (●) as well as the 3 sessions in the pilot study (○). One subject (□) made hypermetric and hypometric saccades in an inconsistent fashion; when the average of only the hypometric saccades was measured (◊), his data agreed with that of the other 11 subjects (r2 = 0.57, P = 0.002). Nevertheless, this subject was excluded from the linear regression (solid line; r2 = 0.60, P = 0.002) because the nature of his expectation of inherent hypometria was unclear.