Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Biomed Eng. 2011 Jan 4;39(4):1278–1295. doi: 10.1007/s10439-010-0220-2

TABLE 2. Comparison of local performance in the four phenotypic regions of Fig. 2.

Criteriona
Phenotypic region 1 ⇑b 2 ⇑ 3 ⇓ 4 ⇓
1 1 k1/(ρkm) 2 1/k2
2 1 k1/(ρkm) 4 1/ke
3 1 k1/(ρk2) 4 1/ke
4 1 k1/(ρk2) 2 1/km
a

The criteria are described in the text and their quantification is defined in Table 1.

b

To improve the performance according to the definitions in Table 1, one must have either a high (⇑) or a low (⇓) value for the associated criterion.