. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Mar 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Mar;37(2):405–415. doi: 10.1037/a0021967

Table 5.

Task-Switching and Cue-Switching Effects With the 2:1 Mapping

Experiment	N	Task Switches	Task Repetitions	Cue Repetitions	Task-Switching Effect (Difference Between Shortest and Longest CTI)	Cue-Switching Effect (Difference Between Shortest and Longest CTI)
1	32	753	717	668	36^* (−6)	49^* (56^†)
2	32	884	836	768	48^* (22)	68^* (32)
3	32	1049	1009	860	40 (−22)	149^* (131)
4	32	974	925	752	49^* (32^†)	173^* (143^†)
5	32	980	892	742	88^* (9)	150^* (121^†)
Altmann (2006)	15	1364	1290	1003	74	287^*

p < .05 for the contrast using the error term for the main effect of transition from the relevant ANOVA (For Altmann’s data, we indicate the results of his statistical analyses.)

^†

p < .05 for the omnibus transition × CTI interaction (involving all CTIs) from the relevant ANOVA involving only the transitions of interest

Note. N = number of subjects with data for each mapping. Task-switching effect = difference between task switches and task repetitions. Cue-switching effect = difference between task repetitions and cue repetitions. Values are in milliseconds.