. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Mar 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Mar;37(2):405–415. doi: 10.1037/a0021967

Table 7.

Best-Fitting Model Parameters

		1:1 Mapping			2:1 Mapping

Experiment	Fit	RT_Base	μ_TS	μ_CR	RT_Base	μ_TS	μ_TR	μ_CR
1	Individual	603 ± 41	275 ± 32	177 ± 26	595 ± 56	294 ± 43		177 ± 29
					(588 ± 50)	(303 ± 44)	(259 ± 44)	(185 ± 35)
	Group	610	270	171	604	288		170
					(601)	(292)	(249)	(174)
2	Individual	668 ± 44	414 ± 90	276 ± 48	652 ± 39	390 ± 54		240 ± 42
					(648 ± 42)	(394 ± 57)	(335 ± 52)	(244 ± 46)
	Group	698	388	245	667	378		227
					(668)	(377)	(318)	(226)
3	Individual	735 ± 82	447 ± 75	225 ± 48	730 ± 74	497 ± 67		252 ± 55
					(718 ± 78)	(510 ± 77)	(460 ± 76)	(263 ± 71)
	Group	761	424	200	759	468		230
					(762)	(464)	(418)	(226)
4	Individual	698 ± 80	421 ± 60	183 ± 48	610 ± 65	544 ± 87		266 ± 65
					(593 ± 65)	(561 ± 107)	(504 ± 91)	(286 ± 82)
	Group	721	400	166	643	519		237
					(650)	(511)	(452)	(229)
5	Individual	706 ± 68	464 ± 91	177 ± 37	613 ± 69	617 ± 153		296 ± 89
					(580 ± 86)	(653 ± 179)	(540 ± 158)	(336 ± 120)
	Group	725	452	161	660	590		256
					(663)	(586)	(475)	(252)
Altmann (2006)	Individual	833	494	242	684	1005		546

Note. RT_Base = residual processing time, μ = mean cue encoding time, TS = task switch, TR = task repetition, CR = cue repetition. Means with 95% confidence intervals are reported for the individual fits. Values in parentheses are from fits to the 2:1 mapping data including task repetitions. Altmann’s parameter values are from his reported model fits. All parameter values are in milliseconds.