Table 2.
Program development phases
| Study phase | Format | Sample | Results and feedback |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phase one | |||
| Focus groups | 2-h group meetings, survey | College students N = 27 | Ratings of current diet, personalized advice and motivational slogans; interactive meal planning; basic nutrition information; gender issues related to food, dieting and body image; debunking dieting myths; healthy, cost-effective meal alternatives |
| 2-h group meeting, survey | Health experts N = 6 | Realistic meal strategies; long–term consequences of poor diet; physiological information; appropriate caloric information for body size and build; snacking tips; nutrient/vitamin info | |
| Concept mapping task | Formal content analysis of all participant ratings of website content ideas using The Concept Systems® software q 2004–2006; all rights reserved. Concept Systems Inc. | N = 21 Eight students | Identification of most relevant content areas: healthy eating on a budget |
| Eight health experts Five researchers | Healthy meal planning; personalization features; basic nutrition facts; body image/weight concerns; expert nutrition info | ||
| Phase two | Pilot website development | One module, Eating on the Run, developed Included sample assessment/profile, two interactive tools (meal planner, fast food calorie chart), article, strategy, expert Q&A, audio peer stories | |
| Phase three | |||
| Usability/acceptance tests | 45-min independent review of website | College students N = 16 | Positive indicators for ease of navigation; visual appeal; quality of content; overall satisfaction; suggestions for improvement |
| Acceptance test | Health experts N = 6 | ||