Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Apr 12.
Published in final edited form as: Eval Program Plann. 2006 Feb;29(1):23–33. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2005.04.018

Table 2.

Program development phases

Study phase Format Sample Results and feedback
Phase one
Focus groups 2-h group meetings, survey College students N = 27 Ratings of current diet, personalized advice and motivational slogans; interactive meal planning; basic nutrition information; gender issues related to food, dieting and body image; debunking dieting myths; healthy, cost-effective meal alternatives
2-h group meeting, survey Health experts N = 6 Realistic meal strategies; long–term consequences of poor diet; physiological information; appropriate caloric information for body size and build; snacking tips; nutrient/vitamin info
Concept mapping task Formal content analysis of all participant ratings of website content ideas using The Concept Systems® software q 2004–2006; all rights reserved. Concept Systems Inc. N = 21 Eight students Identification of most relevant content areas: healthy eating on a budget
Eight health experts Five researchers Healthy meal planning; personalization features; basic nutrition facts; body image/weight concerns; expert nutrition info
Phase two Pilot website development One module, Eating on the Run, developed Included sample assessment/profile, two interactive tools (meal planner, fast food calorie chart), article, strategy, expert Q&A, audio peer stories
Phase three
Usability/acceptance tests 45-min independent review of website College students N = 16 Positive indicators for ease of navigation; visual appeal; quality of content; overall satisfaction; suggestions for improvement
Acceptance test Health experts N = 6