Skip to main content
. 2011 Jan 14;300(4):H1182–H1193. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01108.2010

Table 1.

Comparison of numeric data for initial peak Ca2+, sustained phase Ca2+, and overall NO output

Ca2+ Peak, nM
Ca2+ 900 s, nM
NO 1,500 s (Relative to Basal-No Units)
n Means SE Fold luteal Means SE Fold luteal Means SE Fold luteal
Luteal
    Iono 9 335.2 35.7 1.00 0.229 0.029 1.00
    ATP 11 65.7 6.0 1.00 5.0 3.1 1.00 0.128 0.016 1.00
    %Max 56.07%
Follicular
    Iono 8 314.8 41.2 0.94 0.292 0.023 1.28*
    ATP 10 71.9 14.2 1.09 6.2 2.5 1.24 0.190 0.025 1.48*
    %Max 64.89%
Pregnant
    Iono 12 333.8 27.4 1.00 0.442 0.067 1.93*
    ATP 12 125.2 18.9 1.90* 19.3 5.6 3.85* 0.328 0.041 2.56*
    %Max 74.13%

All values are from data shown in Figs. 4 and 5 and are means ± SE; n = group sizes. Data are also reexpressed as fold mean luteal values. Overall nitric oxide (NO) output is as indicated by 4,5-diaminofluoresceine signal at 1,500 s. %Max is percentage of the NO produced in response to ATP relative to maximal NO output [in response to ionomycin (Iono)]. Relative to the luteal uterine artery endothelium (UA Endo) efficiency of 56.07%, follicular UA Endo improved by a further 8.82% and pregnancy UA Endo increased by 18.06% overall. Of note, relative changes in maximal endothelial NO synthase activity in pregnant UA Endo was even greater in response to ATP (as shown in Figs. 4 and 5).

*

P < 0.05, significance from luteal UA Endo response.

P < 0.05, significance from follicular UA Endo response.