Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Neurosci. 2011 Jan 11;33(5):978–990. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07567.x

Table 4.

Stimulation, recording, and mechanical characteristics to determine interhemispheric inhibition during wrist flexion with lengthening and shortening contraction.

50%MVC 90%MVC

Variable Rest L S L S
CCS, mV Mean 0.46 0.47 0.44 0.42 0.44
±SD 0.12 0.12 0.09 0.13 0.07
TS, mV Mean 0.29 0.33 0.35 0.30 0.31
±SD 0.05 0.19 0.16 0.14 0.13
Position, ° Mean −0.23 −0.14 −0.27 0.11
±SD 0.33 0.23 0.14 0.20
Force, N Mean 50.0 52.7 88.2 90.0
±SD 4.13 11.04 9.62 22.21
EMG, % Mean 41.7 50.6 89.9 93.2
±SD 9.32 10.88 15.47 15.14
EMG, mV Mean 0.004 0.005 0.004 0.004
±SD 0.001 0.032 0.001 0.001

CCS, m V - contralateral conditioning stimulus delivered to the right M1; TS, mV - test stimulus delivered to the left M1; L and S, lengthening and shortening contraction of the left wrist flexors; Position, ° - position of the left wrist. Neutral position is 0° and positive values indicate flexion; Force, N - measured force in Newtons, matched between L and S at 50 and 90% of shortening MVC; EMG, % - EMG activity in the left FCR as a percent of EMG recorded during MVC