Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Microbiol. 2010 Nov 23;79(2):387–401. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07456.x

Table 2.

Integration length (bp) in various mutants following inter-strain recombination

genotype upstream nc downstream n overalld n
meana P valueb mean P value mean P value
WT 2099 n/ae 27 1856 n/a 25 4070 n/a 25

ΔnucT 2206 0.78 35 3023 0.03 35 5229 0.095 35
ΔnucT rdxA::nucT 2135 0.91 29 2542 0.16 29 4676 0.38 29

ΔrecJ 1969 0.68 47 2583 0.1 47 4503 0.48 45
ΔaddA 1981 0.74 24 2072 0.68 25 4110 0.95 24
ΔxseA 1631 0.23 18 2474 0.29 19 4167 0.9 18
ΔaddAΔrecJ 1633 0.21 26 1943 0.87 27 3748 0.65 25

ΔrecG 1298 0.01 28 1552 0.52 29 2930 0.06 27
ΔrecG rdxA::recG 1585 0.12 30 2570 0.17 28 4256 0.79 28
ΔruvB 1900 0.59 29 2342 0.32 25 4276 0.76 25

ΔruvC 2779 0.07 29 2717 0.1 27 5598 0.029 26
ΔruvC rdxA::ruvC 1954 0.67 28 2421 0.29 28 4363 0.68 27
ΔdprB 2398 0.42 29 2311 0.35 28 4824 0.26 27
a

Integration length (bp) were calculated as the midpoints between informative SNPs or restriction sites. Based on the average of n clones.

b

t-test was used to compare the mean integration length of wild type bacteria to the mean integration length of the mutants. p-values < 0.05 are highlighted in grey.

c

number of clones analyzed in each recipient strain

d

n value for overall length is occasionally different than upstream and downstream length because clones with interspersed donor and recipient sequences that could indicate multiple recombination events were excluded.

e

not available