Table 2.
Variables | Mean | Standard Deviation |
---|---|---|
Demographic and family stress characteristics | ||
Women’s age | 30.98 | 4.18 |
Partners’ age | 33.01 | 5.13 |
Number of children | 2.29 | 0.86 |
Women’s social support level | 26.76 | 12.19 |
Family SES | 3.29 | 1.30 |
Family crisis | 1.03 | 0.83 |
Women’s symptomatology | ||
Lifetime DIS-III AUD symptom percentage | 6.63 | 12.96 |
Lifetime DIS-III ASPD symptom percentage | 11.05 | 13.14 |
Lifetime DIS-III MDD symptom percentage | 20.63 | 28.15 |
Alcohol problems (DDHQ) | 1.09 | 2.36 |
Antisocial behavior (ASB) | 4.63 | 3.44 |
Depression (HRSD) | 5.54 | 6.30 |
Partners’ symptomatology | ||
Alcohol problems (DDHQ) | 4.32 | 5.43 |
Antisocial behavior (ASB) | 9.61 | 7.58 |
Depression (HRSD) | 4.52 | 5.86 |
Children’s symptomatology | ||
Externalizing behavior ratings (CBCL) | 11.76 | 5.66 |
Internalizing behavior ratings (CBCL) | 5.19 | 3.63 |
Neighborhood environment (census tract variables) | ||
Adult unemployment rate a | 6.54 | 3.65 |
Poverty rate a | 10.00 | 7.56 |
Percentage of residents without high school diploma a | 18.19 | 7.93 |
Percentage of residents living in different residence 5 years ago b | 45.71 | 9.89 |
Percentage of vacant households b | 4.24 | 2.15 |
Percentage of rented housing units b | 28.65 | 15.50 |
These variables were used to calculate the composite score of socioeconomic disadvantage.
These variables were used to calculate the composite score of residential instability.