Table 1.
Otoacoustic Emissions Testing | Automated Auditory Brainstem Response Testing | |
---|---|---|
Advantages | Simple testing technique (relatively minimal training needed to perform OAE testing); Cheaper than AABR screening; Fast |
Superior evaluation of the auditory system (vs assessment of outer hair cell function alone as in OAE); Likely provides better detection of infants with auditory neuropathy; |
Disadvantages | Limited assessment of the auditory system; Impacted by middle ear fluid issues; Potentially impacted by vernix or wax in the ear canal; Optimal to perform in a quiet environment; |
Requires more operator knowledge than OAE testing; Potential for electrical and noise artifact yielding poor screening; Requires sleeping or quiet infant; Optimal to perform in a quiet environment; Requires longer times than OAE screening; Typically more costly than OAE screening; |