Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Oct;18(5):399–404. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e32833d475d

Table 1.

Comparison of OAE and AABR Newborn Hearing Screening Technologies

Otoacoustic Emissions Testing Automated Auditory Brainstem Response Testing
Advantages Simple testing technique (relatively minimal training needed to perform OAE testing);
Cheaper than AABR screening;
Fast
Superior evaluation of the auditory system (vs assessment of outer hair cell function alone as in OAE);
Likely provides better detection of infants with auditory neuropathy;
Disadvantages Limited assessment of the auditory system;
Impacted by middle ear fluid issues;
Potentially impacted by vernix or wax in the ear canal;
Optimal to perform in a quiet environment;
Requires more operator knowledge than OAE testing;
Potential for electrical and noise artifact yielding poor screening;
Requires sleeping or quiet infant;
Optimal to perform in a quiet environment;
Requires longer times than OAE screening;
Typically more costly than OAE screening;