Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Mar 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Biomech. 2011 Jan 11;44(5):924–929. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.11.028

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The increase in anterior tibial translation of the reconstructed knee relative to the contralateral intact knee was measured as a function of flexion (mean and 95% confidence intervals). Zero denotes a knee that exactly mimics the motion of the contralateral side. Patients with grafts placed anteroproximally on the femur had increased anterior tibial translation relative to the contralateral side between 0 and 60° of flexion, while the anatomically placed grafts more closely restored normal knee motion. (*p < 0.05)