Table 2.

Predicting Couple Communication over 10 years as a function of Time (at level-1) and Intervention Group (at level-2) for n=81 mother/fathers dyads.

Positive Couple Communication ( ${\chi }_{(6)}^2=5.13$, p = 0.53; CFI = 1.00; RMSEA [90% CI] = 0.00 [0.00, 0.13])
		Parameter	Estimate	SE	p	Adj p
Fixed Effects
Intercept, η0i	Intercept	α0	8.32	0.56	<0.01	<0.01
	Marital vs. Control	γA0	0.10	0.78	0.90	0.99
	Parenting vs. Control	γB0	−0.50	0.78	0.52	0.99
Linear, η1i	Intercept	α1	−1.32	0.29	<0.01	<0.01
	Marital vs. Control1	γA1	1.20	0.38	<0.01	0.02
	Parenting vs. Control2	γB1	0.80	0.40	0.04	0.33
Quadratic, η2i	Intercept	α2	0.13	0.03	<0.01	<0.01
	Marital vs. Control3	γA2	−0.13	0.04	<0.01	0.01
	Parenting vs. Control4	γB2	0.08	0.04	0.03	0.27

Negative Couple Communication ( ${\chi }_{(8)}^2=10.35$, p = 0.24; CFI = 0.91; RMSEA [90% CI] = 0.06 [0.00, 0.15])
		Parameter	Estimate	SE	p	Adj p
Fixed Effects
Intercept, η0i	Intercept	α0	6.76	0.72	<0.01	<0.01
	Marital vs. Control	γA0	−0.44	0.99	0.66	0.99
	Parenting vs. Control	γB0	090	1.00	0.37	0.98
Linear, η1i	Intercept	α1	0.41	0.47	0.38	0.99
	Marital vs. Control5	γA1	−1.40	0.62	0.02	0.19
	Parenting vs. Control	γB1	−1.06	0.63	0.09	0.58
Quadratic, η2i	Intercept	α2	0.04	0.05	0.41	0.99
	Marital vs. Control6	γA2	0.15	0.06	0.02	0.13
	Parenting vs. Control	γB2	0.10	0.06	0.11	0.65

¹Effect size r=0.33;

²Effect size r=0.22;

³Effect size r=0.35;

⁴Effect size r=0.23;

⁵Effect size r=0.25;

⁶Effect size r=0.26

Note: Adjusted p-values determined by Bonferroni correction