Table 2.
Affection | Discipline | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Equal (n = 156) | Incongruent (n = 72) | Equal (n = 83) | Incongruent (n = 109) | Congruent (n = 39) | |
Familism values | 4.49 (0.31) a | 4.34 (0.31) b | 4.54 (0.27) x | 4.37 (0.35) y | 4.34 (0.32) y |
Traditional gender role attitudes | 2.13 (0.50) a | 1.87 (0.47) b | 2.15 (0.52) x | 2.04 (0.49) x | 1.79 (0.44) y |
Cultural orientation | −1.40 (1.17) a | −0.42 (1.52) b | −1.66 (1.08) x | −0.86 (1.37) y | −0.24 (1.41) z |
Coparenting satisfaction | 7.53 (1.25) a | 7.17 (1.28) b | 7.58 (1.35) | 7.22 (1.32) | 7.37 (1.18) |
Marital love | 2.58 (0.38) a | 2.45 (0.39) b | 2.59 (0.38) x | 2.46 (0.41) y | 2.55 (0.35) x y |
Marital conflict | 4.13 (1.40) | 4.36 (1.26) | 3.97 (1.43) | 4.38 (1.39) | 4.16 (1.03) |
Youth risky behavior 1 | 0.31 (0.20) | 0.33 (0.19) | 0.28 (0.19) x | 0.36 (0.22) y | 0.30 (0.16) x y |
Youth depressive symptoms 1 | 1.85 (0.36) | 1.82 (0.36) | 1.78 (0.32) x | 1.92 (0.39) y | 1.75 (0.34) x y |
Parent education | 9.45 (3.58) a | 11.38 (3.46) b | 8.59 (3.58) x | 10.34 (3.42) y | 12.54 (2.81) z |
Age spacing | 2.72 (1.55) a | 3.38 (1.59) b | 2.88 (1.48) x y | 2.72 (1.57) x | 3.51 (1.73) y |
Note. Means in the same row with different subscripts are significantly different from each other (a, b are affection comparisons; x, y, z are discipline comparisons; p < .05).
Youth adjustment models included the older sibling’s age and both siblings’ genders as covariates.