Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Proteins. 2011 Mar 1;79(5):1623–1634. doi: 10.1002/prot.22987

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Comparison of the iTM/IS-scores for assessing the quality of protein docking models. (A) Score distributions of incorrect docking models and of near native docking models. iTMS and ISS denote iTM-score and ISS score, respectively. (B) ROC curves of sensitivity versus false positive rate.