Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Subst Use Misuse. 2010 Apr 16;45(14):2481–2502. doi: 10.3109/10826081003692106

Table 4.

Results of multilevel logistic regression of HED among 12,553 females and 11,972 male current drinkers in 17 countries, from GENACIS

Women Men


Model 1 Model 2 Model 1 Model 2




Variable β (eSD*β − 1)*100 β (eSD*β − 1)*100 β (eSD*β − 1)*100 β (eSD*β − 1)*100
Fixed effects
  Mean drinking
    Intercept −0.80 −0.76 0.63* 0.63*
    Log −0.26 −11.50 0.12 6.80
GDP-PPP
    Age −0.03** −26.57 −0.02* −20.20 −0.03* −28.34 −0.03** −28.34
    Log −0.05* −2.32 −0.05 −2.38
GDP-PPP
    Education −0.08 −5.53 −0.07 −4.58 −0.17** −11.22 −0.17** −11.22
    Cohabitation 0.52** 23.20 0.52** 23.12 0.31** 12.85 0.31** 12.85
Random effects Variance    
  Level-2 variance 0.8973** 0.8035** 0.5854** 0.5794**
  Age slope 0.0004** 0.0001* 0.0008** 0.0003**
  Education slope 0.0207** 0.0162**
*

p < 0.05,

**

p < 0.01.

GDP-PPP = Gross domestic product per capita based on purchasing power parity; SD = standard deviation.