Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Mass Spectrom. 2011 Mar 1;300(2-3):99–107. doi: 10.1016/j.ijms.2010.04.006

Table 2.

Summary of the variables and their low/high levels for which used to test the air amplifier performances. Device was tested in 3 different fractional factorial design experiments.

Variable Level + Level − Motivation
Position of
vacuum peak
1 mm
from ESI
inlet
1 mm
from MS
inlet
Previous experiments showed that
these 2 parameters could have a
positive impact
ESI Gap 9 mm 6 mm As no improvement was found at
3mm with the amplifier during
previous experiment, larger space
was explored
ESI Voltage 3200 V 2800 V Range that showed good
performance in previous
experiments
N2 Temperature 100°C 25°C Hot N2 can improve desolvation
Air amplifier
pressure
45 PSI 30 PSI Amplifier pressure range
Composition 100% H20 25%
H20/75%
ACN
Test the hypothesis that the air
amplifier can improve desolvation
of aqueous solvents.
Air amplifier
radial alignment
Centered 0.75 mm
offset
Previous experiments performed
earlier showed that some
ESI Tip size 100 μm 75 μm As previous experiments showed no
overall signal improvement with air
amplifier. This is to test the
hypothesis that better results can
be obtained with larger tips
Flow 2 μL/min 1 μL/min