Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Apr 14.
Published in final edited form as: Bone Marrow Transplant. 2010 Jan 11;45(9):1408–1416. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2009.371

Table 1.

Patient Characteristics

Patient Characteristic No. Patients
Age (y)
 Median [range] 41 [5–59]
 <20 8
 20–29 4
 30–39 16
 40–59 33
Donor
 Matched related 42
 Mismatched related 8
 Matched unrelated 8
 Mismatched unrelated 3
Histologic Diagnosis (WHO classification)
 Diffuse large B-cell 7
 Mantle Cell 9
 Lymphoblastic 10
 Anaplastic large cell 7
 Follicular 10
 Transformed 11
 Othera 7
Stageb
 II 9
 III 11
 IV 26
Karnofsky Performance Status
 ≥ 80 50
 < 80 11
Extranodal sites involved
 ≤ 1 51
 > 1 10
LDH
 Median [range] 174 [104–474]
 ≤ 210 39
 > 210 22
Bone marrow involvementc
 Yes 14
 No 47
Prior chemotherapy regimens
 Median [range] 2 [1–8]
 1–2 32
 >2 29
Response to last therapy
 Complete remission 15
 Partial remission 24
 Stable disease 10
 Refractory 12
Second-line age-adjusted IPI (sAAIPI)
 Low-risk 18
 Low-intermediate risk (1) 22
 High-intermediate risk (2) 13
 High risk (3) 8
a

Diffuse small cleaved cell (n=1), Diffuse mixed small and large cell (n=1), Small lymphocytic (n=1), HTLV-I associated Adult T cell (n=1), Angioimmunoblastic (n=1), Burkitt’s (n=1), Mycosis Fungoides (n=1);

b

Fifteen patients were in CR prior to allo-HSCT – highest stage since diagnosis: stage III=9, stage IV=52;

c

Bone marrow involvement at any time since diagnosis was present in 38 patients.