Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Hum Biol. 2011 Mar 28;23(3):346–352. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.21140

Table 3.

Examining associations with overweight/obesity using mixed models accounting for intra-individual and city/town level clustering.

Model 1 N=3,487 Model 2 N=3,487 Model 3 N=1,629 Model 4 N=1,615
OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
Age 0.99 0.96–1.51 0.99 0.91–1.00 0.96 0.91–1.00 0.92 0.86–0.96
Sex 1.17 0.89–1.54 1.16 0.78–1.51 1.11 0.84–1.47 1.02 0.76–1.40
Area-level deprivation 1.20 0.96–1.51 1.15 0.91–1.45 1.11 0.88–1.40 1.17 0.90–1.51
% Indian Heritage
 <25% Ref Ref Ref
 25–50% 1.93 1.02–3.65 1.50 0.80–2.81 1.58 0.80–3.12
 50–75% 2.02 1.08–3.75 1.63 0.88–3.00 1.31 0.68–2.54
 >75% 2.47 1.34–4.55 1.94 1.06–3.55 1.62 0.85–3.11
Test for trend Χ2= 6.15, p=0.01 Χ2= 4.99, p= 0.03 Χ2= 1.06, p= 0.30
Blood pressure
 Normal Ref Ref
 Pre-HTN 4.21 2.39–7.43 3.80 1.99–7.26
 HTN 7.45 4.42–12.55 5.92 3.27–10.72
AN 16.20 8.08–32.48

Note: Staged multilevel mixed models were constructed, beginning with demographic factors and area-level SDE and subsequently adding PIH, hypertension and presence of AN. A Wald test was used for assess the linear trend of PIH for each model.