Figure 6.

a) 2-D plots of effective r_H1′,H4 versus φ/ψ for aqueous methyl β-maltoside, b) average ³J_C1′,H4 using Eq. 5 versus φ/ψ for aqueous methyl β-maltoside, c) effective r_H1′,H3 versus φ/ψ for aqueous methyl α-cellobioside and d) average ³J_C1′,H4 using Eq. 5 versus φ/ψ for aqueous methyl α-cellobioside. Dihedral angles φ and ψ are given in degrees, r_H1′,H4 and r_H1′,H3 are given in Å and ³J_C1′,H4 are given in Hz.