Table 3.
FACTORS INFLUENCING SUSTAINABILITY | |||
---|---|---|---|
LEVEL | REQUIREMENTS | FACILITATORS | BARRIERS |
Innovation | |||
Development process |
Involvement in development and small scale testing 1-4 Support from process consultants 1-4 Having time to develop strategies 1-4 |
Time consuming and ineffective 1-4 |
|
Content |
Carefully designed work manuals 3 |
Perceived as important 1-4 Easily integrated 1-4 Manuals essential tools 1-4 Clear programme branding 1-4 |
Time consuming 1-4 Not suiting specific needs of immigrants 1,2,4 Difficulty with social and psychological problems 1,2 Found similar to approaches already present at the work place 1,2,4 |
Individual | |||
Professionals |
Own commitment and interest 1-4 |
Own values coherent with programme's purpose and goals 1-4 |
Lack of motivation 2,3,4 Programme goals found unrealistic 2 |
Parents (Patients) |
Positive attitudes to interventions 3,4 |
New topics and questionnaires intrusive and extensive 1-3 Content of parent meetings unpopular 1,3 |
|
Context | |||
Social |
Regular meetings 1-4 Permanent programme organization 1-3 Information to new employees 1,3 Managerial responsibility and commitment1-4 |
Regular meetings 1-4 Active managerial support 1-4 |
Lack of managerial involvement or support 1-4 Lack of involvement or support from physicians or other colleagues 1-3 |
Organizational |
Programme integrated in action plans 1-3 Geographical proximity for collaborators 1-4 Sufficient time 1-3 Further establishment and spread of the programme 1-4 |
Geographical proximity for collaborators 1-4 |
Lack of time and resources 1-4 Lack of communication and agreement between programme management and local managers 2,3 |
Economical and political |
Incentives in line with programme intentions 3 |
Conflicting incentives for performance 3 Threat of cutbacks 1-3 |
1 Represent the views of midwives, 2 child health nurses, 3 dental hygienists/dental nurses, 4 open pre-school teachers
* With an added level; development process.