Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb 16;218(4):386–401. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2011.01347.x

Table 2.

Inter-specific scaling properties of individual and combined articular facet surface areas relative to centroid size and body mass in hominoid primates

Facet surface area vs. cubed centroid size (CS3) Facet surface area vs. body mass


Facets Facet type Scaling exponent (95% CI) R2 Reject isometry? Scaling exponent (95% CI) R2 Reject isometry?
Trochlea Male-type 0.676 (0.639, 0.713) 0.998 No 0.767 (0.643, 0.891) 0.986 No
Head Male-type 0.654 (0.567, 0.740) 0.991 No 0.741 (0.584, 0.897) 0.977 No
Sustentaculum Male-type 0.744 (0.607, 0.880) 0.982 No 0.841 (0.649, 1.034) 0.973 No
Calcaneal Female-type 0.782 (0.693, 0.872) 0.993 Yes 0.886 (0.688, 1.084) 0.974 Yes
Head articular unit Male-type 0.673 (0.559, 0.787) 0.985 No 0.762 (0.563, 0.961) 0.965 No
Trochlea articular unit Mixed 0.657 (0.605, 0.709) 0.997 No 0.746 (0.620, 0.873) 0.985 No
Subtalar joint functional unit Mixed 0.766 (0.663, 0.869) 0.991 No 0.867 (0.676, 1.058) 0.975 Yes