Skip to main content
. 2011 May;13(3):305–312. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2010.12.001

Table 1.

Call Rates and Reproducibility of the Dynamic Array for Scale-up Genotyping of 1698 Samples against 24 SNPs

SNP CH samples (n = 461)
KK samples (n = 1237)
Call rate (%) Reproducibility (%) Call rate (%) Reproducibility (%)
Avg 99.2 99.4 97.6 96.3
1 100 99.8 99.7 96.2
2 99.7 99.1 99.2 94.3
3 98 98.5 89.5 95.3
4 99.8 100 96.4 97.3
5 99.1 98.7 99.4 98.5
6 100 100 99.3 95.5
7 100 100 99.3 97.6
8 99.9 98.9 95.8 95.6
9 99.7 99.3 97.9 94.7
10 100 100 99.6 98.1
11 99 99.8 98.6 94
12 99.6 99.1 97.9 91.5
13 98.2 99.3 99.2 96
14 99.7 99.6 99.4 97.5
15 99.9 99.8 95.3 97.6
16 99.7 99.6 99.5 95.7
17 94 98.9 (76.7) (93.8)
18 99.7 99.3 99.7 98.4
19 98.9 99.6 94.7 97.7
20 (31.8) (97.6) (6.2) (94.1)
21 99.9 99.8 99.2 96.8
22 98 99.3 93.5 97
23 99.8 97.6 97.3 96.7
24 98 99.6 96.8 97.1

The performance indicators used to evaluate the genotyping platforms were defined according to the following formulae: i) Call rate (%) = (No. of successful base calls)/(Total no. of assays performed) × 100 and ii) Reproducibility between replicates (%) = {1 − [(No. of assays inconsistent between replicates)/(Total no. of assays)]} × 100.

Values in parentheses were excluded from the overall rate computations as they had failure rates of >19%.