TABLE 5.
Serum antioxidant quartiles |
|||||||
Q2 vs. Q1 |
Q3 vs. Q1 |
Q4 vs. Q1 |
P-trend | ||||
OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | ||
MetS (NCEP ATP III),4n = 1574 | μmol/L | ||||||
Total retinol+retinyl esters | 1.83 | (1.00; 3.35) | 0.83 | (0.46; 1.51) | 1.22 | (0.63; 2.36) | 0.091 |
Total carotenoids | 0.73 | (0.41; 1.28) | 0.363 | (0.22; 0.58) | 0.323 | (0.18; 0.56) | <0.001 |
Vitamin E | 0.79 | (0.41; 1.52) | 1.54 | (0.84; 2.84) | 1.09 | (0.44; 2.67) | 0.489 |
Vitamin C | 0.98 | (0.62; 1.53) | 0.523 | (0.28; 0.98) | 0.52 | (0.25; 1.10) | 0.033 |
Other components4 | |||||||
Elevated HOMA-IR, n = 2366 | |||||||
Total retinol+retinyl esters | 1.14 | (0.85; 1.52) | 0.87 | (0.58;1.32) | 1.07 | (0.70; 1.65) | 0.905 |
Total carotenoids | 0.633 | (0.47; 0.83) | 0.533 | (0.40; 0.70) | 0.313 | (0.23; 0.42) | <0.001 |
Vitamin E | 0.99 | (0.71; 1.37) | 1.21 | (0.87; 1.68) | 0.77 | (0.40; 1.46) | 0.538 |
Vitamin C | 0.71 | (0.48; 1.04) | 0.623 | (0.41; 0.92) | 0.64 | (0.40; 1.00) | 0.039 |
Elevated CRP, n = 2382 | |||||||
Total retinol+retinyl esters | 0.373 | (0.19; 0.68) | 0.143 | (0.04; 0.44) | 0.173 | (0.06; 0.51) | <0.001 |
Total carotenoids | 0.50 | (0.23; 1.08) | 0.313 | (0.13; 0.73) | 0.083 | (0.03; 0.25) | <0.001 |
Vitamin E | 2.65 | (0.92; 7.67) | 1.94 | (0.58; 6.48) | 7.593 | (1.35; 42.65) | 0.075 |
Vitamin C | 0.78 | (0.43; 1.42) | 0.393 | (0.19; 0.78) | 0.48 | (0.19; 1.30) | 0.075 |
Hyperuricemia, n = 1354 | |||||||
Total retinol+retinyl esters | 3.513 | (1.57; 7.84) | 2.463 | (0.89; 6.78) | 5.303 | (2.71; 10.39) | 0.001 |
Total carotenoids | 0.67 | (0.35; 1.28) | 0.393 | (0.18; 0.83) | 0.413 | (0.20; 0.85) | 0.026 |
Vitamin E | 1.05 | (0.59; 1.84) | 1.31 | (0.73; 2.33) | 1.39 | (0.61; 3.17) | 0.383 |
Vitamin C | 0.47 | (0.87; 1.60) | 0.66 | (0.34; 1.30) | 0.443 | (0.20; 0.98) | 0.043 |
Values are OR with 95% CI. Sampling design complexity is taken into account in all analyses. Vitamin C was not included in this analysis due to a appreciable drop in sample size (vitamin C available only for the 2003–2004 and 2005–2006 waves of NHANES).
Models included the 4 main antioxidant status exposures and adjusted for socio-demographic factors: age, sex, race/ethnicity, marital status, educational level and PIR, and other potential confounders: lifestyle and health-related factors (smoking status, PA: Met⋅h⋅wk−1, recoded as 0 to <5, 5–10, >10) and dietary intakes (total energy intake, alcohol, caffeine, β-carotene, vitamin C, vitamin E ,and dietary supplement use), serum levels of folate, tHcy, vitamin B-12, 25(OH)D, total cholesterol, and TG.
< 0.05 for null hypothesis that Loge(OR) = 0 based on Wald test.
See Methods section for definition of each component and Figure 1 footnotes for range of serum antioxidant quartiles Q1 through Q4.