Table 2.
Gene2 | Description | Expression ratio3 | Fn/Fn+Sc ratio4 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fn | Sc | Fn+Sc | |||
IL1α | Interleukin 1, alpha | 9.92 | 1.41 | 2.53 | 3.92 |
IL6 | Interleukin 6 | 1.16 | 0.65 | 0.38 | 3.08 |
IL18 | Interleukin 18 | 0.77 | 0.44 | 0.40 | 1.90 |
CCL16 | Chemokine ligand 16 | 3.84 | 1.31 | 2.65 | 1.45 |
LTB | Lymphotoxin beta | 3.56 | 1.61 | 2.51 | 1.41 |
TNFα | Tumor necrosis factor, | 2.32 | 0.85 | 1.64 | 1.41 |
XCL2 | Chemokine ligand 2 | 2.56 | 1.06 | 1.84 | 1.40 |
CCL19 | Chemokine ligand 19 | 2.44 | 1.28 | 1.84 | 1.32 |
IL11 | Interleukin 11 | 2.17 | 1.21 | 1.65 | 1.31 |
CXCL11 | Chemokine ligand 11 | 2.31 | 0.92 | 1.77 | 1.30 |
CCL2 | Chemokine ligand 2 | 2.50 | 1.31 | 2.11 | 1.19 |
CCL13 | Chemokine ligand 13 | 2.68 | 1.49 | 2.32 | 1.15 |
CCL22 | Chemokine ligand 22 | 2.93 | 1.89 | 2.84 | 1.03 |
CCL15 | Chemokine ligand 15 | 2.12 | 1.48 | 2.08 | 1.02 |
CCL7 | Chemokine ligand 7 | 1.93 | 1.35 | 2.06 | 0.94 |
IL10Rα | Interleukin 10 receptor, alpha | 4.82 | 2.06 | 6.64 | 0.73 |
CCR9 | Chemokine receptor 9 | 1.47 | 1.59 | 2.04 | 0.72 |
CCL1 | Chemokine ligand 1 | 1.50 | 2.79 | 2.52 | 0.60 |
IL4 | Interleukin 4 | 2.75 | 4.89 | 5.86 | 0.47 |
Overall mean5 | 2.83 ± 0.86 | 1.56 ± 0.97 | 2.40 ± 1.46 |
After background subtraction, the signal intensity of each gene present was normalized to that of GAPDH. The expression levels of different genes after bacterial exposure were compared with those from uninfected controls and expressed as relative ratios. Only the genes that had a fold change > 2-fold or < 0.5-fold in any condition (shown in bold) were included for analysis.
Genes whose expression levels were significantly modulated by any experimental treatment. They were sorted in a descending order according to the Fn/Fn+Sc ratio.
Values represent mean relative ratios from two independent experiments.
Fold changes in expression levels when comparing F. nucleatum and F. nucleatum plus S. cristatus. Fn, F. nucleatum; Sc, S. cristatus; Fn+Sc, F. nucleatum plus S. cristatus.
Values represent the mean ± SD for each ratio column. Statistical comparison showed that the overall expression level induced by S. cristatus was significantly lower than F. nucleatum (P = 0.0046), as well as lower than F. nucleatum plus S. cristatus (P = 0.04). However, the difference between F. nucleatum and F. nucleatum plus S. cristatus was not significant.