Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Apr 15.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Neurosci. 2010 May 24;31(11):1946–1959. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07231.x

Table 1.

Analyses of IFF values before and after apamin administration

Region
Apamin
Region × apamin
Bonferroni post hoc comparisons, P-value
Current step F1,10 P-value F1,10 P-value F1,10 P-value latDS pre- vs.
post-apamin
NAS pre- vs.
post- apamin
Basal latDS
vs. NAS
Apamin latDS
vs. NAS
Initial IFF values before and after apamin
 Step 1 8.054 0.018 19.757 0.001 3.311 0.099 0.001 0.093 0.004 0.235
 Step 2 12.276 0.006 22.937 < 0.001 0.635 0.444 0.003 0.018 0.004 0.025
 Step 3 9.186 0.013 8.003 0.018 0.995 0.342 0.022 0.225 0.007 0.063
 Step 4 5.710 0.038 11.873 0.006 0.926 0.359 0.011 0.110 0.022 0.145
 Step 5 3.238 0.102 6.611 0.028 0.590 0.460 0.040 0.231 0.071 0.284
Final IFF values before and after apamin
 Step 1 17.868 0.002 12.153 0.006 0.033 0.860 0.027 0.042 0.003 0.004
 Step 2 2.418 0.151 10.229 0.010 0.337 0.575 0.024 0.094 0.121 0.244
 Step 3 0.553 0.474 9.264 0.012 0.170 0.689 0.035 0.093 0.410 0.629
 Step 4 0.344 0.570 6.219 0.032 0.001 0.987 0.106 0.111 0.588 0.596
 Step 5 0.305 0.596 4.287 0.072 0.035 0.857 ND ND ND ND

P-values < 0.05 are considered significant; ND, not determined; IFF, instantaneous firing frequency.