Table 1.

ANOVA results and effect sizes (partial η-squared) for analysis of overall performance. The top half of the table compares NH and HI groups. A three-way ANOVA was conducted with spatial configuration and overlap condition as within-subjects factors, and listener group as a between-subjects factor. The bottom half of the table compares NH and NHLP groups. A three-way ANOVA was conducted with spatial configuration, overlap condition, and filtering as within-subjects factors.

Groups	Factor	df	F	p	Effect size
NH vs HI	Spatial	1, 16	328.6	0.000a	0.95
	Overlap	2, 32	16.8	0.000a	0.51
	Group	1, 16	2.8	0.12	0.15
	Spatial × overlap	2, 32	2.1	0.14	0.11
	Spatial × group	1, 16	26.8	0.000a	0.63
	Overlap × group	2, 32	3.5	0.042b	0.18
	Spatial × overlap × group	2, 32	2.0	0.15	0.11
NH vs NHLP	Spatial	1, 5	134.3	0.000a	0.96
	Overlap	2, 10	6.1	0.018b	0.55
	Filter	1, 5	2.0	0.22	0.28
	Spatial × overlap	2, 10	0.6	0.56	0.11
	Spatial × filter	1, 5	2.1	0.21	0.29
	Overlap × filter	2, 10	4.8	0.035b	0.49
	Spatial × overlap × filter	2, 10	1.0	0.42	0.16

^aSignificant at p < 0.005.

^bSignificant at p < 0.05.