Skip to main content
. 2011 Apr 15;6(4):e18622. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018622

Figure 8. Costs and Benefits of resting state cell-cell variability.

Figure 8

(A) Change of the distribution of resting states Inline graphic during stress for the initial parameters Inline graphic. Subpopulations potentially able to resume growth quickly (large Inline graphic) rapidly decline upon stress exposure, resulting in a time dependent average activity (dashed black line) and death rate. (B) The population decay therefore deviates from the exponential decay of a homogeneous population. Panel (C) shows regimes in which cell-cell variability reduces (light gray, Inline graphic) or enhances (dark gray, Inline graphic) the population growth lag. At large steady state growth rates Inline graphic, population recovery is driven by the tail of the activity distribution with shorter than average growth lags. At small growth rates Inline graphic, or large variability Inline graphic, the recovery is driven by the bulk of the distribution with longer than average growth lags. Panel (D) shows regimes of benefits (light gray, Inline graphic) and costs (dark gray, Inline graphic) of cell-cell variability in full cycles of stress and regrowth. Heterogeneity represents a disadvantage when the population average is optimally adapted, i.e. when environments are sufficiently periodic and close to the white line compare with Fig. 5B. When environments fluctuate over a wide range, heterogeneous populations benefit from fast responders when the stress duration Inline graphic is short, and from highly stress resistant cells when Inline graphic is large.