Table 4.

Results by the method of using respiratory signal. For each patient, we tried three different w values (0.5, 0.75, and 1) and gave the average results. The last row was computed based on the results obtained by w=0.75, which were shown in bold.

	w	TP	TN	FP	FN	Sensitivity	Specificity	Sensitivity×specificity
Patient 1	0.5	26	30	35	9	0.74	0.46	0.34
	0.75	20	41	24	15	0.57	0.63	0.36
	1	17	50	15	18	0.49	0.77	0.36
Avg	0.75	21	40.3	24.7	14	0.6	0.62	0.37
Patient 2	0.5	26	123	40	11	0.70	0.75	0.52
	0.75	21	149	14	16	0.57	0.91	0.52
	1	18	156	7	19	0.49	0.96	0.47
Avg	0.75	21.7	142.7	20.3	15.3	0.59	0.87	0.51
Patient 3	0.5	15	67	54	8	0.65	0.55	0.29
	0.75	9	87	34	14	0.39	0.72	0.28
	1	8	100	21	15	0.35	0.83	0.29
Avg	0.75	10.7	84.7	36.3	12.3	0.46	0.7	0.32
Patient 4	0.5	25	47	26	12	0.68	0.64	0.44
	0.75	13	50	23	24	0.35	0.68	0.24
	1	10	56	17	27	0.27	0.77	0.21
Avg	0.75	16	51	22	21	0.43	0.70	0.30
Patient 5	0. 5	15	18	28	9	0.63	0.39	0.24
	0.75	14	24	22	10	0.58	0.52	0.30
	1	8	31	15	16	0.33	0.67	0.22
Avg	0.75	12.3	24.3	21.7	11.7	0.51	0.53	0.27
Avg	w=0.75	15.4	70.2	23.4	15.8	0.50	0.70	0.35